MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400814514 · doi:10.1002/alz.13877

Advancements in APOE and dementia research: Highlights from the 2023 AAIC Advancements: APOE conference

2024· review· en· W4400814514 on OpenAlexaff
Courtney M. Kloske, Michaël E. Belloy, Elizabeth Blue, Gregory R. Bowman, María C. Carrillo, Xiaoying Chen, Ornit Chiba‐Falek, Albert A. Davis, Gilbert Di Paolo, Francesca Garretti, David Gate, Lesley R. Golden, Jay W. Heinecke, Joachim Herz, Yadong Huang, Costantino Iadecola, Lance A. Johnson, Takahisa Kanekiyo, Celeste M. Karch, Anastasia Khvorova, Sascha J. Koppes‐den Hertog, Bruce T. Lamb, Paige E. Lawler, Yann Le Guen, Alexandra Litvinchuk, Chia‐Chen Liu, Simin Mahinrad, Edoardo Marcora, Claudia Mariño, D. M. Michaelson, Justin J. Miller, Josh M. Morganti, Priyanka Narayan, Michel Satya Naslavsky, Marlies Oosthoek, Kapil V. Ramachandran, Abhirami Ramakrishnan, Ana‐Caroline Raulin, Aiko Robert, Rasha N.M. Saleh, Claire E. Sexton, Nilomi Shah, Francis Shue, Isabel J. Sible, Andrea Soranno, Michael R. Strickland, Julia TCW, Manon Thierry, Li‐Huei Tsai, Ryan A. Tuckey, Jason D. Ulrich, Rik van der Kant, Na Wang, Cheryl L. Wellington, Stacie Weninger, Hussein N. Yassine, Na Zhao, Guojun Bu, Alison Goate, David M. Holtzman

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersTriad National SecurityNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesCure Alzheimer's FundMedical Research CouncilOpen Philanthropy ProjectNational Institutes of HealthConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsNIH Office of the DirectorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteGood Ventures FoundationCenters for Disease Control and PreventionJPB FoundationBrightFocus FoundationU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationRobert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg FoundationNational Eye InstituteNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationEdward N. and Della L. Thome Memorial FoundationMassachusetts General HospitalNational Science FoundationNational Institute of General Medical SciencesRemondi Family Foundation
KeywordsApolipoprotein ENeuroinflammationDementiaDiseaseNeurosciencePathogenesisMedicineAmyloid betaBioinformaticsPsychologyImmunologyBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) is an established central player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with distinct apoE isoforms exerting diverse effects. apoE influences not only amyloid-beta and tau pathologies but also lipid and energy metabolism, neuroinflammation, cerebral vascular health, and sex-dependent disease manifestations. Furthermore, ancestral background may significantly impact the link between APOE and AD, underscoring the need for more inclusive research. METHODS: In 2023, the Alzheimer's Association convened multidisciplinary researchers at the "AAIC Advancements: APOE" conference to discuss various topics, including apoE isoforms and their roles in AD pathogenesis, progress in apoE-targeted therapeutic strategies, updates on disease models and interventions that modulate apoE expression and function. RESULTS: This manuscript presents highlights from the conference and provides an overview of opportunities for further research in the field. DISCUSSION: Understanding apoE's multifaceted roles in AD pathogenesis will help develop targeted interventions for AD and advance the field of AD precision medicine. HIGHLIGHTS: APOE is a central player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. APOE exerts a numerous effects throughout the brain on amyloid-beta, tau, and other pathways. The AAIC Advancements: APOE conference encouraged discussions and collaborations on understanding the role of APOE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207