The influence of earthworks construction on porewater pressures in clays and mudstones of the Lias Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring the changes in porewater pressure associated with the construction of earthworks can yield information on the stiffness and permeability of the ground, as well as how the natural groundwater regime might be impacted. This paper presents 3 years of porewater pressure measurements in weathered Lias Group mudstone, obtained from a trial cutting and a trial embankment constructed for the UK's High Speed Two (HS2) railway. The immediate changes in porewater pressure were small in relation to the changes in total stress imposed. This can be explained by the consolidation or swelling during the period of construction, combined with the sensitivity of very stiff clays and mudstones to a very small (0.5%) reduction in the degree of saturation. In the longer term, porewater pressures reduced across the site owing to the reduction in ground level at the trial cutting. Rates of porewater pressure change were accelerated by more permeable limestone within the ground profile reducing drainage path lengths. It was concluded that construction-induced porewater pressure changes may be smaller, and their rate of dissipation more rapid, in weathered clays and mudstones such as those of the Lias Group than in younger, more compressible clay deposits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".