Adiabatic Limit, Theta Function, and Geometric Quantization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let $\pi\colon (M,\omega)\to B$ be a non-singular Lagrangian torus fibration on a complete base $B$ with prequantum line bundle $\bigl(L,\nabla^L\bigr)\to (M,\omega)$. Compactness on $M$ is not assumed. For a positive integer $N$ and a compatible almost complex structure $J$ on $(M,\omega)$ invariant along the fiber of $\pi$, let $D$ be the associated Spin${}^c$ Dirac operator with coefficients in $L^{\otimes N}$. First, in the case where $J$ is integrable, under certain technical condition on $J$, we give a complete orthogonal system $\{ \vartheta_b\}_{b\in B_{\rm BS}}$ of the space of holomorphic $L^2$-sections of $L^{\otimes N}$ indexed by the Bohr-Sommerfeld points $B_{\rm BS}$ such that each $\vartheta_b$ converges to a delta-function section supported on the corresponding Bohr-Sommerfeld fiber $\pi^{-1}(b)$ by the adiabatic(-type) limit. We also explain the relation of $\vartheta_b$ with Jacobi's theta functions when $(M,\omega)$ is $T^{2n}$. Second, in the case where $J$ is not integrable, we give an orthogonal family $\big\{ {\tilde \vartheta}_b\big\}_{b\in B_{\rm BS}}$ of $L^2$-sections of $L^{\otimes N}$ indexed by $B_{\rm BS}$ which has the same property as above, and show that each $D{\tilde \vartheta}_b$ converges to $0$ by the adiabatic(-type) limit with respect to the $L^2$-norm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it