MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400838428 · doi:10.1002/pbc.31216

Local evidence in sub‐Saharan Africa; the CANCaRe Africa experience—Lessons learned and shared thoughts about the way forward

2024· article· en· W4400838428 on OpenAlexaff
Trijn Israëls, Cecilia Mdoka, Diriba Fufa, George Chagaluka, Nickhill Bhakta, Brenda Mallon, Elizabeth Molyneux, Lillian Sung, Yamikani Chimalizeni, Barnabas Atwiine

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersFoundation S
KeywordsClosing (real estate)MedicineKey (lock)Childhood cancerEconomic growthChild survivalDeveloping countryCancerPolitical scienceChild mortality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collaborative research generating local evidence is key to closing the research and survival gap between sub-Saharan Africa and high-income countries. Lessons learned by CANCaRe Africa, the Collaborative African Network for Childhood Cancer Care and Research while pioneering such research are being discussed together with recommendations for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.223
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.249
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2230.249
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0170.016
Open science0.0040.020
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207