Canada Food and Agriculture: institutional aspects of state regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассмотрена эволюция государственного регулирования агропродовольственного комплекса Канады. Исследование посвящено выявлению уникальных позитивных особенностей агропродовольственной системы Канады. Дана периодизация аграрной политики страны, осуществлен анализ государственных программ развития агропродовольственного комплекса, изучены параметры устойчивого функционирования отраслей и звеньев агропродовольственного комплекса. Объектом исследования являются особенности стратегического планирования, развития инфраструктурной и инвестиционной среды агропродовольственного комплекса Канады. The article discusses the evolution of government regulation of the agri-food complex of Canada. The study is dedicated to identifying the unique positive features of Canada’s agri-food system. The periodization of the country's agrarian policy is given, the analysis of state programs for the development of the agri-food complex is carried out, the parameters of the stable functioning of the sectors and links of the agri-food complex arestudied. The object of the study is the features of strategic planning, the development of the infrastructure and investment environment of the Canadian agri-food complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".