A simulation-based investigation of the robustness of sequences of operation to zone-level faults in single-duct multi-zone variable air volume air handling unit systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-performance sequences of operation for variable air volume (VAV) air handling units (AHUs) respond to requests from zones, leaving these sequences vulnerable to faults that occur at the zone level. While prior research has shown that ASHRAE Guideline 36 reduces energy consumption, its ability to withstand zone-level faults is understudied. This paper investigates the fault tolerance of supply air temperature (SAT) setpoint, duct static pressure (DSP) setpoint and mode of operation (MOP) in single-duct multi-zone VAV AHUs. First, customized sequences were defined for different scenarios in EnergyPlus in this study. Then, common actuator/sensor faults were injected into one zone to identify the most efficient fault-tolerant scenario. The results indicate that trim and respond reset logic is the most fault-tolerant scenario for this paper's case study, with a 12% energy use intensity (EUI) increase for the SAT setpoint and an 11% increase for the DSP setpoint. Moreover, implementing an average temperature-based control for MOP significantly reduces the setup/setback mode activation, resulting in a lower EUI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it