Jean-Jacques Chardin, Gwendolyne Cressman et Fanny Moghaddassi (éds), Territory | Territoire(s), Ranam (Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines) n° 57
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This bilingual volume examines the notion of "territory" from different vantage points, bringing together a variety of contributions from diverse fields, with a majority of articles focusing on contemporary literary material from North America. In that sense, Territory/Territoire(s) reflects current efforts in academia to transcend disciplinary boundaries and holds true to the promise of pluri-disciplinarity formulated in the preface. The contributors to this volume have set out to draw the conceptual boundaries of "territory" and explore the multiple ways in which this notion may inform our understanding of certain literary productions, historical events, and sociogeographical realities, from the 16 th century to the present day. They grapple with the semantic multivalence of the term, measure its representational weight, and dissect its political implications across parts of the anglophone world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it