MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400863905 · doi:10.1177/19253621241264857

Sudden Death in Pediatric Patient With Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to Founder Variant in <i>NKX2-5</i> : Case Report

2024· article· en· W4400863905 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Scibetta, Barbara A. Sampson, Yingying Tang, Bruce D. Gelb

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Forensic Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic pathologyDilated cardiomyopathyFounder effectMedicineSudden deathSudden cardiac deathCardiomyopathyCause of deathAutopsyCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureGeneticsHaplotypeBiologyDiseaseGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The NKX2-5 gene encodes a transcription factor that plays a role in atrioventricular nodal and myocardial development. Pathogenic variants of NKX2-5 are associated with congenital heart disease and sudden cardiac death. The missense variant in this case is one of the more common ones in Northern Europe and has high penetrance in familial cases. To our knowledge, this is the youngest person who died due to this variant. Case summary: This was a healthy, asymptomatic 14-year-old male with well-managed mild congenital dilated cardiomyopathy who died unexpectedly in his home. Postmortem examination revealed the NKX2-5 pathogenic missense variant, p.Phe145Leu, as the only explicable cause of death. Discussion: We propose that immediate family members of those who die suddenly due to NKX2-5 disease undergo genetic counseling and longitudinal screening to include this gene, as pathogenic variants in the NKX2-5 gene may manifest in a time-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Forensic PathologySame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207