Prediction of Room‐Temperature Superconductivity in Quasi‐Atomic H<sub>2</sub>‐Type Hydrides at High Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Achieving superconductivity at room temperature (RT) is a holy grail in physics. Recent discoveries on high‐ T c superconductivity in binary hydrides H 3 S and LaH 10 at high pressure have directed the search for RT superconductors to compress hydrides with conventional electron–phonon mechanisms. Here, an exceptional family of superhydrides is predicated under high pressures, M H 12 ( M = Mg, Sc, Zr, Hf, Lu), all exhibiting RT superconductivity with calculated T c s ranging from 313 to 398 K. In contrast to H 3 S and LaH 10 , the hydrogen sublattice in M H 12 is arranged as quasi‐atomic H 2 units. This unique configuration is closely associated with high T c , attributed to the high electronic density of states derived from H 2 antibonding states at the Fermi level and the strong electron–phonon coupling related to the bending vibration of H 2 and H‐ M ‐H. Notably, MgH 12 and ScH 12 remain dynamically stable even at pressure below 100 GPa. The findings offer crucial insights into achieving RT superconductivity and pave the way for innovative directions in experimental research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".