MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400869467 · doi:10.1002/jgt.23152

Cycles in 3‐connected claw‐free planar graphs and 4‐connected planar graphs without 4‐cycles

2024· article· en· W4400869467 on OpenAlexfundno aff
On‐Hei Solomon Lo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graph Theory · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsPlanar graphClawPlanar straight-line graphChordal graphPlanarOuterplanar graph1-planar graphPathwidthDiscrete mathematicsGraphComputer scienceLine graphBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cycle spectrum of a graph is the set of the cycle lengths in . Let be a graph class. For any integer , define to be the least integer such that for any with circumference at least . Denote by , and the classes of 3‐connected planar graphs, 3‐connected cubic planar graphs, 3‐connected claw‐free planar graphs, and 3‐connected claw‐free cubic planar graphs, respectively. The values of and were known for all . In the first part of this article, we prove the claw‐free version of these results by giving the values of and for all . In the second part we study the cycle spectra of 4‐connected planar graphs without 4‐cycles. Bondy conjectured that every 4‐connected planar graph has all cycle lengths from 3 to except possibly one even length. The truth of this conjecture would imply that every 4‐connected planar graph without 4‐cycles has all cycle lengths other than 4. It was already known that . We prove that can be embedded in the plane such that for any has a ‐cycle and all vertices not in lie in the exterior of .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graph TheorySame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207