MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400870815 · doi:10.1093/psquar/qqae062

Recognition Politics: Indigenous Rights and Ethnic Conflict in the Andes <i>by Lorenza B. Fontana</i>

2024· article· en· W4400870815 on OpenAlexaffabout
Roberta Rice

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitical Science Quarterly · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitics and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsEthnic groupEthnic conflictPolitical scienceLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Without a doubt, one of the most promising developments in Latin America over the past thirty years has been the rise of Indigenous movements and the expansion of democracy to include Indigenous actors and issues. Fontana's book is about what happens next now that Indigenous groups are relatively entrenched as social and political actors, or what the author terms the “post-recognition phase” (14). The book tells the story of the non-Indigenous, rural, poor communities who have been left behind by international recognition politics. Without recourse to Indigenous identity and living in an environment of resource scarcity, building resentment by peasant groups has translated into intercommunal conflicts with Indigenous peoples in the featured cases of Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. In an era of growing strife and instability in the Andes, this book will make Indigenous politics scholars stop and think about the potential ramifications of our work. The central thesis of the book is that recognition reforms that advance Indigenous peoples’ rights to the exclusion of other rural folk can produce “recognition conflicts” in the form of violent disputes between peasant groups and Indigenous peoples (4). This is a controversial argument, one that runs counter to the literature on multiculturalism and Indigenous rights. Based on extensive field work observations carried out in the three country cases, Fontana, to support her points, provides paradigmatic examples of disputes between Indigenous people and peasant communities in issue areas ranging from territorial control and prior consultation to bilingual intercultural education. In one example, a 2007 protest in the Bolivian Amazon saw hundreds of disaffected peasants march into an Indigenous territory and national park with chainsaws, threatening to clear cut the forest in response to the state's granting of the land title to an Indigenous organization. In another example, an illegal migrant settlement within an Indigenous territory in the Peruvian Amazon was attacked by members of the local Awajún community in a 2002 skirmish that left sixteen people dead (160). The author makes a compelling case for the need for more scholarly attention to the horizontal dimensions of contentious Indigenous politics in a literature that is dominated by a focus on the vertical conflicts between Indigenous peoples and the state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitical Science QuarterlySame topicPolitics and Society in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207