MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400876131 · doi:10.3390/s24144707

Deformation Estimation of Textureless Objects from a Single Image

2024· article· en· W4400876131 on OpenAlexafffund
Sahand Eivazi Adli, Joshua K. Pickard, Ganyun Sun, Rickey Dubay

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersMitacs
KeywordsPolygon meshArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceVertex (graph theory)Computer visionDeformation (meteorology)GraphImage (mathematics)RGB color modelChamfer (geometry)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsGeometryComputer graphics (images)Theoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deformations introduced during the production of plastic components degrade the accuracy of their 3D geometric information, a critical aspect of object inspection processes. This phenomenon is prevalent among primary plastic products from manufacturers. This work proposes a solution for the deformation estimation of textureless plastic objects using only a single RGB image. This solution encompasses a unique image dataset of five deformed parts, a novel method for generating mesh labels, sequential deformation, and a training model based on graph convolution. The proposed sequential deformation method outperforms the prevalent chamfer distance algorithm in generating precise mesh labels. The training model projects object vertices into features extracted from the input image, and then, predicts vertex location offsets based on the projected features. The predicted meshes using these offsets achieve a sub-millimeter accuracy on synthetic images and approximately 2.0 mm on real images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207