SUMO promotes DNA repair protein collaboration to support alternative telomere lengthening in the absence of PML
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway maintains telomere length in a significant fraction of cancers that are associated with poor clinical outcomes. A better understanding of ALT mechanisms is therefore necessary for developing new treatment strategies for ALT cancers. SUMO modification of telomere proteins contributes to the formation of ALT telomere-associated PML bodies (APBs), in which telomeres are clustered and DNA repair proteins are enriched to promote homology-directed telomere DNA synthesis in ALT. However, it is still unknown whether-and if so, how-SUMO supports ALT beyond APB formation. Here, we show that SUMO condensates that contain DNA repair proteins enable telomere maintenance in the absence of APBs. In PML knockout ALT cell lines that lack APBs, we found that SUMOylation is required for manifesting ALT features independent of PML and APBs. Chemically induced telomere targeting of SUMO produces condensate formation and ALT features in PML-null cells. This effect requires both SUMOylation and interactions between SUMO and SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs). Mechanistically, SUMO-induced effects are associated with the accumulation of DNA repair proteins, including Rad52, Rad51AP1, RPA, and BLM, at telomeres. Furthermore, Rad52 can undergo phase separation, enrich SUMO at telomeres, and promote telomere DNA synthesis in collaboration with the BLM helicase in a SUMO-dependent manner. Collectively, our findings suggest that SUMO condensate formation promotes collaboration among DNA repair factors to support ALT telomere maintenance without PML. Given the promising effects of SUMOylation inhibitors in cancer treatment, our findings suggest their potential use in perturbing telomere maintenance in ALT cancer cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".