MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400893375 · doi:10.1136/jnis-2024-snis.313

E-208 Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for medium vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with aspects 4–5 vs. 6–7: a retrospective, multicenter, and multinational study

2024· article· en· W4400893375 on OpenAlexaffabout
Basel Musmar, Nimer Adeeb, H. Salim, Sherief Ghozy, A Guenego, NM Cancelliere, Adam A. Dmytriw, V Mendes Pereira, P Jabbour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOcclusionIschemic strokeStroke (engine)Retrospective cohort studyMultinational corporationMulticenter studyCardiologyInternal medicineIschemiaRandomized controlled trialEngineeringBusinessMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its efficacy in medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke, particularly in patients with low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), remains less explored. <h3>Methods</h3> This retrospective study analyzed data from 443 AIS patients treated with MT for MeVO and low ASPECTS (4–7) at 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe, from September 2017 to July 2021. Patients were categorized into ASPECTS of 4–5 and 6–7. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were assessed. <h3>Results</h3> Of 443 patients, 51 (12%) had ASPECTS of 4–5, and 392 (88%) had scores of 6–7. The median age was 65 years (IQR: 46–79), with a balanced sex distribution between the groups. The most common site of initial occlusion was M2 branch in both groups (92% in ASPECTS 4–5 and 85% in ASPECTS 6–7) (p=0.68). The ASPECTS 4–5 group had lower TICI 2c-3 achievement (31% vs. 55%, p=0.002) and poorer functional outcomes (mRS 0–1 at 90 days: 12% vs. 29%, p=0.03) compared to the ASPECTS 6–7 group. Intracranial hemorrhagic complications were higher in the ASPECTS 4–5 group (69% vs. 47%, p=0.007). Multivariable analysis revealed ASPECTS 6–7 to be associated with higher odds of TICI 2c-3 (OR: 2.5; CI: 1.28 to 4.89, p=0.007) and lower odds of intracranial hemorrhagic complications (OR: 0.4; CI: 0.19 to 0.81, p=0.012). <h3>Conclusion</h3> MT was associated with higher rates of hemorrhagic complications and less favorable functional outcomes in patients with very low ASPECTS (4–5) as compared to those with moderate-to-low ASPECTS (5–6). These findings highlight the importance of patient selection based on ASPECTS for MT in MeVO. <h3>Disclosures</h3> <b>B. Musmar:</b> None. <b>N. Adeeb:</b> None. <b>H. Salim:</b> None. <b>S. Ghozy:</b> None. <b>A. Guenego:</b> None. <b>N. M Cancelliere:</b> None. <b>A. A Dmytriw:</b> None. <b>V. Mendes Pereira:</b> None. <b>P. Jabbour:</b> None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207