Proximity driven plastid–nucleus relationships are facilitated by tandem plastid–ER dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peri-nuclear clustering (PNC) of chloroplasts has largely been described in senescent and pathogen- or reactive oxygen species-stressed cells. Stromules, tubular plastid extensions, are also observed under similar conditions. Coincident observations of PNC and stromules associate the two phenomena in facilitating retrograde signaling between chloroplasts and the nucleus. However, PNC incidence in non-stressed cells under normal growth and developmental conditions, when stromules are usually not observed, remains unclear. Using transgenic Arabidopsis expressing different organelle-targeted fluorescent proteins, we show that PNC is a dynamic subcellular phenomenon that continues in the absence of light and is not dependent on stromule formation. PNC is facilitated by tandem plastid-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) dynamics created through membrane contact sites between the two organelles. While PNC increases upon ER membrane expansion, some plastids may remain in the peri-nuclear region due to their localization in ER-lined nuclear indentions. Moreover, some PNC plastids may sporadically extend stromules into ER-lined nuclear grooves. Our findings strongly indicate that PNC is not an exclusive response to stress caused by pathogens, high light, or exogenous H2O2 treatment, and does not require stromule formation. However, morphological and behavioral alterations in ER and concomitant changes in tandem, plastid-ER dynamics play a major role in facilitating the phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".