The D-HCM Score, a New Diagnostic Tool for Distinguishing Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Hypertensive Cardiopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with moderate hypertrophy is challenging. Hypertensive heart disease (HHD) is the most common differential diagnosis that mimics the LVH of HCM. The aim of this study was to compare the QRS duration in HCM and HHD to create a novel diagnostic tool to identify primary HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an international retrospective multicentre study enrolling patients with true HCM and HHD. A total of 547 individuals with HCM and 139 with HHD were included. The median QRS duration was significantly shorter in HCM than in HHD (88 ms [80-94] vs. 98 ms [88-108]; P < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression identified for the novel diagnostic HCM (D-HCM) score: absence of antihypertensive drugs (+2); family history of unexplained sudden death (+2); QRS duration [<95 ms] = +1; maximum wall thickness (mm) [≥17] = +1. A cumulative QRS-HCM score ≥2 supports the diagnostic certainty of true HCM with a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 99%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 55%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 99%. CONCLUSION: The QRS duration in patient with HCM is significantly shorter compared with patients with HHD-related LVH. QRS duration can be used as a diagnosis marker to distinguish between HCM and HHD. The D-HCM score is a novel, simple, and accurate diagnosis tool for HCM patients with mild to moderate phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".