Effect of superimposing oscillatory flow in a milli‐channel with static internals—A numerical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Superimposition of oscillatory flow over the axial flow is expected to further enhance the mixing phenomenon based on the limited reported literature. A detailed study on the physics of such superimposed flows will be useful to widen the scope of application of static mixers with superimposed oscillatory flow in continuous modes of operation for several purposes. The flow behaviour of a water–vinyl acetate system in a milli‐channel with static internals is studied under the laminar flow regime using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as a tool. A CFD model is developed and validated with reported literature on a Kenics static mixer. The effect of oscillatory flow superimposed over the axial flow in a milli‐channel is studied for Re n = 5 and Re o = 20–65. Residence time distribution (RTD) studies have been carried out and compared numerically for two different geometries, (1) tube without an internal and (2) tube with internals, for two different velocities, (1) net axial velocity and (2) superimposed oscillatory velocity. Results of these RTD studies indicate a sharp distribution in the channel with static internals having superimposed oscillatory flow followed by the channel with static internals with net axial velocity and then a tube without an internal. It is also found that Péclet number (Pe) for static internals with oscillatory flow > net axial flow > tube without an internal (736 > 641 > 315). Further, velocity magnitude, pressure, and Q‐criterion are discussed in detail to understand fluid flow behaviour in the milli‐channel. From this research, it is understood that superimposing oscillatory flow along with static internals resulted in enhanced mixing when compared with a tube with no internal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".