MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400930743 · doi:10.25251/skin.8.supp.406

Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Safety and Efficacy Results From the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials

2024· article· en· W4400930743 on OpenAlexaff
April W. Armstrong, Mark Lebwohl, Richard B. Warren, Howard Sofen, Akimchi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, Mamitaro Ohtsuki, Lynda Spelman, Thierry Passeron, Kim Papp, Matthew J. Colombo, John Vaile, Eleni Vritzali, Kim Hoyt, Carolin Daamen, Subhashis Banerjee, Bruce Strober, Diamant Thaçi, Andrew Blauvelt

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchManchester Biomedical Research CentreDermiraBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsPlaque psoriasisPsoriasisMedicineComputer scienceDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Upon trial completion, patients could enroll in the ongoing POETYK long-term extension (LTE) trial. Here, deucravacitinib safety and efficacy are reported through 4 years. Methods: PSO-1/PSO-2 randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg QD, or apremilast 30 mg BID. At Week 52, patients in the LTE received open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg QD. Safety was evaluated in patients receiving ≥1 deucravacitinib dose. Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 person-years (PY) was used to assess adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90, and sPGA 0/1 and were analyzed using mNRI in LTE patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1 of the parent trials. Results: 1519 patients received ≥1 deucravacitinib dose; cumulative exposure was 4392.8 PY. EAIRs/100 PY were decreased/comparable from the 1- to 4-year cumulative period, respectively: AEs (229.2, 131.7), serious AEs (5.7, 5.0), deaths (0.2, 0.3), discontinuation due to AEs (4.4, 2.2), herpes zoster (0.8, 0.6), malignancies (1.0, 0.9), MACE (0.3, 0.3), and venous thromboembolism (0.2, 0.1). With continuous deucravacitinib treatment (n = 513), clinical response rates were maintained from Year 3 (PASI 75, 73.8% [95% CI, 69.6, 78.0]; PASI 90, 49.0% [95% CI, 44.4, 53.7]; sPGA 0/1, 55.2% [95% CI, 50.5, 59.9]) to Year 4 (PASI 75, 71.7% [95% CI, 67.0, 76.3]; PASI 90, 47.5% [95% CI, 42.6, 52.4]; sPGA 0/1, 57.2% [95% CI, 52.1, 62.2]) by mNRI. Conclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated durable efficacy with continuous treatment and a safety profile through 4 years consistent with that at 3 years, without new or long-term safety signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207