Sex-specific blood-derived RNA biomarkers for childhood tuberculosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Confirmatory diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) remains a challenge mainly due to its dependence on sputum samples and the paucibacillary nature of the disease. Thus, only ~ 30% of suspected cases in children are diagnosed and the need for minimally invasive, non-sputum-based biomarkers remains unmet. Understanding host molecular changes by measuring blood-based transcriptomic markers has shown promise as a diagnostic tool for TB. However, the implication of sex contributing to disease heterogeneity and therefore diagnosis remains to be understood. Using publicly available gene expression data (GSE39939, GSE39940; n = 370), we report a sex-specific RNA biomarker signature that could improve the diagnosis of TB disease in children. We found four gene biomarker signatures for male (SLAMF8, GBP2, WARS, and FCGR1C) and female pediatric patients (GBP6, CELSR3, ALDH1A1, and GBP4) from Kenya, South Africa, and Malawi. Both signatures achieved a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 70%, which approaches the WHO-recommended target product profile for a triage test. Our gene signatures outperform most other gene signatures reported previously for childhood TB diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".