MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400932466

The Application Value of Psychological Counseling Based on the Concept of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy in Patients with Premature Ovarian Failure.

2024· article· en· W4400932466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yue Zhao, Wei Yang, Wang Xi

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremature ovarian failurePsychological therapyPsychotherapistValue (mathematics)Solution focused brief therapyPsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyIntensive care medicineGynecologyPsychiatryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To appraise the application value of psychological counseling based on the concept of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) concept in patients with premature ovarian failure. Methods: A total of 176 patients with premature ovarian failure admitted to China-Japan Union Hospital hospital between January 2020 and February 2021 were enrolled for prospective analysis and were randomly assigned to the control group and the experimental group using the random number table method, with 88 cases in each group. The control group received the normal psychological counseling intervention, whereas the experimental group received the SFBT-based counseling intervention. The serum indexes follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), Estradiol (E2), Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) score, Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) score, Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH) score, self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, and the satisfaction rate were recorded and compared between the two groups of patients. Results: After the intervention, patients in the experimental group achieved lower FSH and LH levels and higher E2 levels than the control group (P < .05). After the intervention, the scores of emotional response, mind-body relationship, and tolerability and overall scores increased in both groups, with the experimental group scoring significantly higher than the control group (P < .05). After the intervention, the differences in hostility and compulsion scores between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > .05). Compared with the control group, patients in the experimental group scored lower on somatization, interpersonal relationship, and psychosis and overall score, while positive factor scores were higher (P < .05). Before the intervention, SDS and SAS scores were comparable in both groups. In contrast, SDS and SAS scores decreased in both groups and in the experimental group compared to the control group after the intervention. (P < .05). Conclusion: Psychological counseling based on the SFBT concept in patients with premature ovarian failure could improve the patients' serum indexes, quality of life, and sense of well-being, which is worthy of clinical promotion. It is recommended that most researchers conduct studies with larger samples in our hospital to provide better evidence-based evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207