MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400941179 · doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.006

The clinical course and outcomes following arthroscopic frozen shoulder 360° release

2024· article· en· W4400941179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brandon Ziegenfuss, Kristine Italia, Kathir Azhagan Stalin, Sarah L. Whitehouse, Ashish Gupta, Kenneth Cutbush

Bibliographic record

VenueJSES International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMedicineRange of motionFrozen shoulderElbowSurgeryPhysical therapyObservational studyPatient satisfactionInternal rotationProspective cohort studyShoulder Impingement SyndromeExternal rotationEtiologyActivities of daily livingRotator cuffInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a debilitating inflammatory condition affecting the shoulder capsule that causes significant pain and stiffness. Its etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment remain poorly understood. Although regarded as self-limiting, FS can have profound implications on the activities of daily living and usually takes 1-4 years to resolve on its own accord. In recalcitrant or severe cases where active range of motion (AROM) is extensively restricted, an arthroscopic 360° release may be performed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes following the FS 360° arthroscopic release. Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted assessing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients who underwent the 360° arthroscopic release between July 2013 and January 2019. Various questionnaires were used to evaluate their shoulder preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Relevant PROMs included the Oxford Shoulder Score; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Constant-Murley Score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and general measures of pain intensity (visual analog scale) and well-being (EQ-5D-3L). AROM movements included forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, internal rotation, as well as external and internal rotation at 90° of abduction. Results: > .05). No complications or reoperations were reported. Conclusion: The arthroscopic 360° release is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe or recalcitrant FS. Statistically and clinically significant improvements in AROM and PROMs (Oxford Shoulder Score; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Constant-Murley Score; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) occurred shortly after the surgery and progressively improved from 2 weeks to 24 months postoperatively, with the operative shoulder achieving similar range of motion as the nonpathological contralateral shoulder at 24 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJSES InternationalSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207