Bibliographic record
Abstract
This contribution expands existing studies on the history of the museum shop as a space between art and retail through a discussion of the Aga Khan Museum Shop in Toronto (AKMS). The AKMS was opened at the same time as the private Aga Khan Museum (AKM) in 2014 and is part of the transnational institutional framework of Ismaili Muslims following the Sevener Shia. I analyze the shop’s architectural design, tonality in public communication, and staff and particularly focus on its collection- and exhibition-inspired product line gained through collaborations with artisans and visual artists from the MENASA region (the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia). Connecting this with perspectives on the historiography of Islamic art allows me to argue that the AKMS embodies a convergence of the symbolic site of the Islamic art museum shop rooted in both consumerist dreamworlds and tasteful design, the Aga Khan’s religious-political agenda and pressure to demonstrate legitimacy within the umma, and Ismaili approaches of culturizing Islam as transcultural heritage. In operating together, these factors generate a commercial site offering products that ideally meet consumer demands of late modern hyperculture in their ability to display authenticity and conspicuous cosmopolitanism. I conclude with the observation that by staging products as signifiers of transculturality and authenticity and by mobilizing nineteenth-century uses of Islamic art for the curation of the self, the AKMS reinvents aura after the age of mechanical reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.115 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".