MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400963000 · doi:10.34925/eip.2023.153.4.221

ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR RENOVATION SERVICES OF A TYPICAL QUARTER

2023· article· ru· W4400963000 on OpenAlex
Е.В. ИЛЬИНА, Anna Romanova, С.Ф. ФЕДОРОВА, Л.Б. МАМЕДОВА, В.Р. МУРАТДИНОВА

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueЭкономика и предпринимательство · 2023
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Architectural engineeringBusinessEngineeringHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Важной частью разрешения проблем, связанных с реновацией выступает разработка и внедрение эффективного механизма как планирования, так и финансирования, посредством которого все мероприятия и будут осуществляться. Для определения целесообразности введения реновации в регионе проведен критический анализ жилого фонда и отдельно произведен расчет примерной общей площади хрущевок, годы строительства которых находятся во временных рамках с конца 1950-х по 1972 г. с учетом деления по районам. В результате, которого общая площадь составила примерно 3866388,08 кв. м. В городе представлены многоквартирные дома разных серий построек включая большое количество кирпичных домов. Показано, что программа должна быть направлена, в первую очередь, на панельные «хрущевки» ранней постройки. An important part of resolving the problems associated with renovation is the development and implementation of an effective mechanism for both planning and financing, through which all activities will be carried out. To determine the feasibility of introducing renovation in the region, a critical analysis of the housing stock was carried out and a separate calculation was made of the approximate total area of Khrushchev houses, the years of construction of which are in the time frame from the late 1950s to 1972, taking into account the division by districts. As a result, the total area was approximately 3,866,388.08 sq. m. The city presents apartment buildings of different series of buildings, including a large number of brick houses. It is shown that the program should be directed, first of all, to panel "Khrushchev" houses of early construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it