MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400964177 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.22.604381

Early morphogenetic patterns of protonemata and gametophores of <i>Physcomitrium patens</i> (Hedw.) Mitt

2024· preprint· en· W4400964177 on OpenAlexaff
M. V. S. Raju, Neil W. Ashton

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtonemaElongationOblique caseApex (geometry)Tip growthPhysicsGeometryOpticsChemistryCrystallographyMaterials scienceAnatomyBiologyBotanyMossComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In axenic culture, protonemata of Physcomitrium (formerly Physcomitrella ) patens (Hedw.) Mitt. are comprised of chloronemata and caulonemata that can be distinguished morpho-structurally. On solid nutrient agar medium, a protonemal inoculum proliferates, initially generating primary chloronemata, and expands radially across the surface of the substratum forming approximately round colonies. The expansion of the colonies derives mainly from centrifugal elongation of newly formed caulonemata, which arise by differentiation of primary chloronemal apical cells in the central region. Most commonly, oblique cross walls separate cells of the uniseriate caulonemal filaments. Each oblique wall organises a smaller and a larger angle with the outer wall of a tubular caulonemal cell. The smaller angle may lie in four different positions, vertically upward or downward, and laterally, to the right or left, parallel to the surface of the solid medium. Chloronemal filaments, which contain cells separated by transverse cross walls, develop from side branch initials (SBIs) at or near the smaller angle at the distal end of caulonemal cells. Like the smaller angle of the oblique cross walls in caulonemata, these secondary chloronemata also show four different orientations, vertically, upward or downward, and laterally, right or left. A strong inverse correlation exists between the placement of SBIs and secondary chloronemata and the direction of caulonemal tip growth. If the caulonemal tips curve downward into the medium, chloronemata are situated vertically on the upper side of caulonemata; similarly, if they turn upward, chloronemata are situated on the lower side. A similar correlation exists when caulonemal tips curve to the right or left on the surface of solid medium, in which case laterally directed chloronemata grow in the opposite direction, i.e. on the outside of the curve. The procumbent caulonemata with their associated protruding secondary chloronemal branches are reminiscent of the heterotrichous branching habit of filaments of some green algae. Gametophore buds develop from a minority of caulonemal SBIs and also occasionally from chloronemata; a stalk cell, which resembles a chloronemal cell, supports each bud. Buds develop into leafy gametophores that are arranged in a fairy ring. We discuss the relative merits of several models that might explain the temporally and spatially regulated clustering of buds resulting in the formation of a fairy ring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→