Cleavage region organizes the structural architecture of the B2 SINE ribozyme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The SINE-encoded B2 retrotransposon is an RNA Polymerase III transcript that gets upregulated during various cellular stress responses. The B2 noncoding RNA can directly inhibit RNA Polymerase II, leading to a significant downregulation of transcripts during stress. Our recent findings have shown that B2 is a self-cleaving epigenetic ribozyme and that cleavage can be induced by interactions with epigenetic factors, co-regulating its function across distinct chromatin-binding target loci. Here, by integrating RNA chemical probing, small angle X-ray scattering, and 3D motif modeling, we determine structural ensemble-to-function relations for the B2 SINE ribozyme RNA. Perturbations of the RNA suggest that the B2 SINE ribozyme has a well-defined secondary structure and dynamic tertiary structure that both critically depend on the presence of the active site of cleavage. In an RNA engineering approach, we examine the effect of point mutations, deletions of the main cleavage site and deletions of the cleavage domain on the structural ensemble of the RNA. By combining this with functional data, we obtain relations of structural ensembles to various functional states. This perturbative approach serves as a template to unravel the relation of structural ensembles to functional states for other ncRNA and mRNA systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".