MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400975149 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2024.3433507

Rate-Splitting Multiple Access With Finite-Alphabet Constellations: Precoder Optimization and Achievable Rate Performance

2024· article· en· W4400975149 on OpenAlexaff
De Mi, Hongzhi Chen, Zheng Chu, Pei Xiao, Yiyan Wu, Chin-Liang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsConstellationAlphabetComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rate Splitting Multiple Access (RSMA) precoder design with the practical finite-alphabet constellations instead of Gaussian inputs has been addressed in this paper. Considering a multiuser (MU) multiple-input single-output (MISO) broadcast channel (BC) system, we derive a generalized expression of the achievable rate for each user, in a way that the derived expression is generically applicable, e.g., for both underloaded and overloaded cases. Building upon the achievable rate expression, we formulate a multi-objective problem that maximizes the weighted sum rate (WSR) of the considered system, which incorporates with the optimization of the RS precoder for both common and private symbol streams in RSMA. The emphasis here is that our derivation of the achievable rate expression, the problem formulation of the WSR and the optimization of the RSMA precoder all involve the finite alphabet constellation constraint. An iterative gradient descent algorithm with alternative optimization and line search methods is applied to solve the optimization problem. Numerical results show that RSMA can reach the maximum achievable WSR, under both underloaded and overloaded scenarios, with less transmit power compared to the traditional schemes, e.g., space division multiple access (SDMA) and power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). Moreover, thanks to its flexibility, RSMA subsumes both SDMA and NOMA as its subset to fit into different scenarios such as underloaded and overloaded cases with different constellation sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207