MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IoT-Based Smart Home Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning Algorithms

2024· article· en· W4400976805 on OpenAlexaff
Bhavana Jamalpur, Arun K Saseendran, V Divya Vani, Vijilius Helena Raj, G. Veeramalai, GinniNijhawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInternet of ThingsHealth careMachine learningArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate an Internet of Things (IoT)-based smart home healthcare monitoring system that is run by machine literacy algorithms. An opportunity to update healthcare monitoring has arisen as a result of the spread of Internet of Things (IoT) devices. This is especially true when it comes to monitoring patients within the comfort of their own homes. To gather real-time data on vital signs and the conditioning of diurnal life from cases, our proposed system makes use of Internet of Things detectors. In addition, machine learning algorithms are utilized to analyze this data, which enables the implementation of proven and forward-thinking healthcare monitoring. The system can adapt to the activities of individual cases by continuously learning, which allows it to identify anomalies and provide predictions about implicit health problems. The incorporation of machine literacy not only improves the precision of health monitoring but also makes it easier to provide early intervention and preventative care, which ultimately leads to the resolution of patient difficulties and a reduction in the expenses of healthcare. This investigation makes a crucial contribution to the rapidly developing field of Internet of Things (IoT)-)-enabled healthcare systems, illustrating the potential for technology to transform conventional approaches to the delivery of healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet of Things and AIFrench-language works237,207