MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400977403 · doi:10.1080/26907240.2024.2374219

A Bird’s Eye View: Toward a Comprehensive and Collaborative Review of Art Therapy Research (Une vue du ciel : vers une revue globale et collaborative de la recherche en art-thérapie)

2024· article· fr· W4400977403 on OpenAlexaff
Haley Toll

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Art Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disciplines such as art therapy progress by gathering, critiquing, and building upon bodies of knowledge to amend and construct theories, generate new methodologies, and establish best practices (G...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.315
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.334
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3150.334
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.004
Bibliometrics0.0170.010
Science and technology studies0.0110.037
Scholarly communication0.0360.051
Open science0.0120.023
Research integrity0.0330.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
DomainEvaluation
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Art TherapySame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207