Low-latency passive thermal desensitization of a silicon micro-ring resonator with self-heating
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analog photonic information processing can be implemented with low chip area using wavelength-division multiplexed systems, which typically manipulate light using micro-ring resonators. Micro-rings are uniquely susceptible to thermal crosstalk, with negative system performance consequences if not addressed. Existing thermal sensitivity mitigation methods face drawbacks including high complexity, high latency, high digital and analog hardware requirements, and CMOS incompatibility. Here, we demonstrate a passive thermal desensitization mechanism for silicon micro-ring resonators exploiting self-heating resulting from optical absorption. We achieve a 49% reduction in thermal crosstalk sensitivity and 1 µs adaptation latency using a system with no specialized micro-ring engineering, no additional control hardware, and no additional calibration. Our theoretical model indicates the potential for significant further desensitization gains with optimized micro-ring designs. Self-heating desensitization can be combined with active thermal stabilization to achieve both responsiveness and accuracy or applied independently to thermally desensitize large photonic systems for signal processing or neural network inference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it