MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400982296 · doi:10.1037/fsh0000907

Life of a Type 1 diabetic.

2024· article· en· W4400982296 on OpenAlexaffabout
Audrey Kilbreath

Bibliographic record

VenueFamilies Systems & Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)PsychologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the life of a Type 1 diabetic. Everything is a danger. Stress, flu, infection, or a common cold could all lead to a hospital stay. There are many negative long-term effects: blindness, loss of a limb, heart attacks, etc. Every day is an effort to keep on top of things. The diabetes cannot be forgotten or ignored. The cost of living with diabetes is atrocious, between the devices, insulin, and other needed supplies. It is expensive to be sick. On top of the insulin pump, there are numerous supplies, such as reservoirs to hold the insulin, the infusion sets to put the plastic needle into the body, along with tubing to carry the insulin from the pump to the insertion point on the abdomen. There are also continuous glucose monitors (CGM), which include a transmitter, as well as sensors that have to be changed weekly. These items are much needed for people like the author, who after having diabetes for 24 years, find it difficult to feel low blood sugars. This difficulty feeling low blood sugars is quite dangerous, and may lead to seizures, brain damage, or even death if unnoticed and untreated. With CGM technology, the transmitter and sensors have saved the author on multiple occasions from seizures, or worse. They are a necessity, and the author needs the CGMs to protect her life. The author highlights a promise of hope in the Canadian Government's plan to financially cover "diabetic medications and supplies." And while it would not cover the expensive drugs not currently covered by the author's insurance, it does mean insulin and oral medications for Type 2 diabetes will no longer be paid out of pocket. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamilies Systems & HealthSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207