Relationship satisfaction among plurisexual young adults: Understanding the unique role of identity abuse.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the link between intimate partner violence and relationship satisfaction is important because of prospective links between this type of satisfaction and mental and physical health. The need to better understand experiences of intimate violence among plurisexual people (those who experience sexual and/or romantic attraction to more than one gender) is highlighted by the fact that they disproportionately experience higher levels of intimate partner violence and report poorer romantic relationship quality than both heterosexual and lesbian/gay people (i.e., monosexual people, or people who are only attracted to one sex/gender). Identity abuse, a form of psychological abuse based in stigmatizing someone's sexual identity, can be particularly detrimental for relationship quality among plurisexual people, who experience stigma from monosexual people, although this may vary across gender identity. In the current study, we examined how experiences of identity abuse were associated with relationship satisfaction among a sample of 538 partnered plurisexual young adults, focusing on differences by gender identity. Identity abuse was associated with poorer relationship satisfaction, even after accounting for other forms of intimate partner violence. Results suggest that identity abuse can be particularly harmful for relationship quality; however, this association held for cisgender women and transgender/nonbinary adults but not cisgender men. Findings of the current study suggest the importance of examining how stigma can occur within plurisexual people's romantic relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".