Road extraction from remote sensing images based on a multi-scale asymmetric dual attention mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of road fracture and detail loss caused by not considering the geometric features in the road extraction method. We proposed an encoder-decoder architecture based on a multi-scale asymmetric dual attention mechanism. Firstly, A multi-scale convolution block in the shape of ‘Union Jack’ is designed. It includes symmetric convolution and asymmetric convolution along horizontal, vertical, left diagonal, and right diagonal spatial directions, and a multi-scale dilated convolution for extracting features of different scales. Remote dependence relationships are highly converged by using it, and road fracture problems caused by occlusion can be solved effectively. Secondly, a directional dual attention mechanism is proposed, which consists of directional channel attention using strip pooling and a directional spatial attention mechanism using asymmetric convolution along left diagonal and right diagonal spatial directions. It can use the directivity of asymmetric convolution to allocate attention mechanism adaptively in attention mechanism, and effectively avoid the road detail loss problem. Finally, we conducted corresponding experiments on the DeepGlobe and Ottawa road datasets, and the experimental results are superior to the current state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".