MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400999474 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63697-4_3

Political Leadership and the Digital Diffusion of Feminist Foreign Policy

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400999474 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karin Aggestam, Annika Bergman Rosamond, Elsa Hedling

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal foreign policy studies. · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsDiffusionPolitical scienceForeign policyPolitical economySociologyLawPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the role of political leadership and the utilisation of digital diplomacy in advancing the norms and objectives of feminist foreign policy. It explores the various roles that leaders play in the political articulation, resonance and contestation of feminist foreign policy in the digital realm. It specifically analyses how and in what ways former Swedish foreign minister Margot Wallström actively engaged, as a norm entrepreneur, in efforts to garner political support for Sweden’s feminist foreign policy, while disseminating a feminist vision of a more gender-just world order to global online audiences. Moreover, the chapter examines how Wallström strategically articulated Sweden’s feminist foreign policy as a prioritised agenda and the international resonance it elicited, particularly evidenced by the positive responses of states such as Canada and Germany. Finally, the chapter elucidates the ramifications of political leadership and gendered contestation on social media by analysing Sweden’s role in the #shedecides digital campaign. This campaign was triggered in response to the reinstatement of the US global gag rule by the Trump Administration, which sought to restrict the sexual and reproductive rights of girls and women worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal foreign policy studies.Same topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207