MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401000984 · doi:10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100163

Standardized reporting of pre-analytical variables and quality control of plasma and serum to enhance rigor and reproducibility in liquid biopsy research

2024· article· en· W4401000984 on OpenAlexaff
Fabrice Lucien, Dakota Gustafson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Liquid Biopsy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproducibilityQuality (philosophy)Medical physicsMedicineControl (management)ChromatographyComputer scienceChemistryPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as pivotal components in the field of liquid biopsy, reflecting the molecular cargo of their cells of origin. Their potential in diagnostics, especially in oncology, is profound. However, the reproducibility of EV-based biomarker studies remains a significant challenge due to pre-analytical variability. To address this, The Blood Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular vesicles (ISEV) recently published the MIBlood-EV: Minimal Information to Enhance the Quality and Reproducibility of Blood Extracellular Vesicle Research,” [1].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.186
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.188
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1860.188
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Liquid BiopsySame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207