Bibliographic record
Abstract
"RETRACTED: Alteration of the Endocannabinoid System in Human Alzheimer’s Disease Brain." USURJ: University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal 9.2 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32396/usurj.v9i2.659 After this article was published, one of the co-authors contacted USURJ indicating that they had not been involved with the article or its submission to USURJ. This is in violation of USURJ’s publication agreement, which the corresponding author had signed. Additionally, the article made use of data that the corresponding author was not authorized to share. The journal determined a retraction was appropriate following the COPE Retraction Guidelines (https://publicationethics.org/retraction-guidelines).As the data was not meant to be public, the article has been removed, and the removed contents are no longer available with a Creative Commons license.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.102 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.221 | 0.173 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".