MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401012588 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104055

Estimation of daytime all-sky sea surface temperature from Himawari-8 based on multilayer stacking machine learning

2024· article· en· W4401012588 on OpenAlexaff
Hongchang He, Donglin Fan, Ruisheng Wang, X. Lyu, Bolin Fu, Yuan Huang, J. C. Sheng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Calgary
FundersJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationPeople's Government of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous RegionBagui Scholars Program of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous RegionNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province
KeywordsDaytimeSkyStackingRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceStreet canyonMeteorologyGeographyAtmospheric sciencesGeologyPhysicsCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Himawari-8 satellite has the capability to rapidly retrieve sea surface temperature (SST) data at a high frequency of 10 min, demonstrating significant potential for various scientific applications. However, the presence of cloud often results in missing SST data at cloud locations, or can reduce the accuracy of retrieved SST. In contrast to the method of reconstructing missing SST data, this study focuses on exploring the potential of inverting SST under all-sky conditions. This study proposes a three-layer stacked machine learning model (TLSM), specifically designed for SST under all-sky conditions. The model integrates cloud properties into its input features to effectively account for the influence of cloud cover. Validation using 30 % match-up pairs generated an overall root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.71 °C, a Bias of −0.01 °C, and an R2 of 0.91 based on 6383 samples. For clear-sky conditions, TLSM demonstrates a noteworthy enhancement in SST inversion accuracy (R2 = 0.98, RMSE=0.35 °C) compared to the official SST product (R2 = 0.86, RMSE=0.88 °C). In cases of optically thin clouds and clouds with low cloud top pressure, TLSM exhibits commendable proficiency in the inversion of SST. The Bias and RMSE for these cloud types indicate better performance compared to the official clear-sky SST data. While including cloud samples may reduce the overall accuracy of the TLSM, it substantially enhances the spatial coverage of the inverted SST. Considering the performance for each cloud type, TLSM may serve as an alternative approach for SST retrieve under thin clouds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207