MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401013577 · doi:10.55016/ojs/jet.v54i3.74685

‘Global’ Education: Migration, Belonging and the ‘Rule’ of Being a Guest

2022· article· en· W4401013577 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Fontenelle-Tereshchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of educational thought. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamContext (archaeology)Privilege (computing)Political scienceGlobal educationEconomic growthDominance (genetics)SociologyCompassionDevelopment economicsGeographyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This article explores the different issues in education in a globalized society, especially significant as the COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing challenges for ‘Global’ Education. It reflectively navigates the stormy waters of '[in]difference' in an intertwined understanding of global and local, exploring the complexities of an increasingly globalized world by conceptualizing the words migration, segregation, integration, and engagement in the context of ‘Global’ Education. From vaccines accessibility to economic woes, from natural disasters and climate change to the intensification of migrations often due to the uneven way economics has worked to privilege a few, while disregarding the needs of most; the pandemic has highlighted inequalities, the inclusion of differences in the mainstream narratives of power and dominance is reflected in this article through the lens of ‘Global’ Education: Home and Abroad. Is there hope for a globally inclusive education in a world in need of compassion and meaningful relations?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.039
Scholarly communication0.0130.011
Open science0.0010.015
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of educational thought.Same topicGlobal Education and MulticulturalismFrench-language works237,207