MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401015780 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35276

Biophysical profiling of red blood cells from thin-film blood smears using deep learning

2024· article· en· W4401015780 on OpenAlex
Erik S. Lamoureux, You Cheng, Emel Islamzada, Kerryn Matthews, Simon P. Duffy, Hongshen Ma

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaCanadian Blood ServicesAustralian Government
KeywordsRed blood cellBlood smearConvolutional neural networkPathologyBiomedical engineeringDeep learningBlood cellMedicineArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImmunologyMalaria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microscopic inspection of thin-film blood smears is widely used to identify red blood cell (RBC) pathologies, including malaria parasitism and hemoglobinopathies, such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia. Emerging research indicates that non-pathologic changes in RBCs can also be detected in images, such as deformability and morphological changes resulting from the storage lesion. In transfusion medicine, cell deformability is a potential biomarker for the quality of donated RBCs. However, a major impediment to the clinical translation of this biomarker is the difficulty associated with performing this measurement. To address this challenge, we developed an approach for biophysical profiling of RBCs based on cell images in thin-film blood smears. We hypothesize that subtle cellular changes are evident in blood smear images, but this information is inaccessible to human expert labellers. To test this hypothesis, we developed a deep learning strategy to analyze Giemsa-stained blood smears to assess the subtle morphologies indicative of RBC deformability and storage-based degradation. Specifically, we prepared thin-film blood smears from 27 RBC samples (9 donors evaluated at 3 storage time points) and imaged them using high-resolution microscopy. Using this dataset, we trained a convolutional neural network to evaluate image-based morphological features related to cell deformability. The prediction of donor deformability is strongly correlated to the microfluidic scores and can be used to categorize images into specific deformability groups with high accuracy. We also used this model to evaluate differences in RBC morphology resulting from cold storage. Together, our results demonstrate that deep learning models can detect subtle cellular morphology differences resulting from deformability and cold storage. This result suggests the potential to assess donor blood quality from thin-film blood smears, which can be acquired ubiquitously in clinical workflows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it