MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401015878 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000038840

The lived experience of patients going under hyperbaric oxygen therapy in Saudi Arabia: A phenomenological study

2024· article· en· W4401015878 on OpenAlexaff
Bayan Alilyyani, Nada Alaidarous, Manal Alsaedi, Sara Alshomrani, Shujun Aljuaid, Salha Alotaibi, Alanoud Alotaibi, Ghadah Ghazi Alotaibi

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersTaif University
KeywordsMedicineThematic analysisPreparednessFeelingInterpretative phenomenological analysisQualitative researchHealth careCategorizationPatient experienceSession (web analytics)Lived experienceGrounded theoryPsychotherapistNursingPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has emerged as an effective treatment or adjunct therapy for various disorders, prioritizing improving oxygen delivery to tissues. This qualitative inquiry aims to explore the psychological experiences of patients undergoing their first hyperbaric session, focusing on the emotional responses and information needs of patients. The study addresses the gap in understanding patient experiences and seeks to contribute to holistic care approaches and improved health outcomes for patients undergoing HBOT. Using a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach, this study engaged 6 participants from KAASH in Taif City who had undergone at least 1 HBOT session. Data were collected through in-person interviews using a semistructured guide, focusing on patients' initial HBOT experiences. Giorgi 4-step method was applied for data analysis, allowing for rich descriptions and thematic categorization of the participants' lived experiences. The analysis is centered around "Walking into the unknown" with emerged subthemes (feeling anxious or being calm; immediate or evolving outcomes; formal orientation and management; success stories and self-learning) organized under 2 revised categories, "Transitioning from fear to reassurance" and "Navigating the path of understanding." The study also highlighted the critical role of healthcare providers in addressing information gaps and enhancing patient preparedness. The findings revealed the importance of comprehensive patient education and effective communication by healthcare providers to alleviate initial fears and improve treatment experiences for HBOT patients. Future research should expand to other regions and include healthcare providers' perspectives to further validate these findings and enhance HBOT practices. Integrating psychological support into the treatment process may also benefit patients, promoting holistic care and improving overall health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207