MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401020544 · doi:10.36713/epra17764

EFFECTIVENESS OF SWISS BALL EXERCISE VERSUS FLOOR EXERCISE ON CORE MUSCLE ENDURANCE IN ATHLETES

2024· article· en· W4401020544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Manikandan, Priya Kumari

Bibliographic record

VenueEPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore stabilityPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineCore (optical fiber)DashTrunkPelvisAnatomyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Core muscles serve as a critical bridge for force transfer between the upper and lower limbs, playing a vital role in body stabilization and force generation during sports activities. The core is visualized as a box comprising the abdominal muscles (front), para-spinals and gluteus muscles (back), diaphragm (roof), and pelvic floor and hip girdle musculature (bottom). Within this structure, the inner unit (transverse abdominals, multifidus, pelvic floor and hip musculature) provides internal stability, while the outer unit (rectus abdominals, external and internal obliques) facilitates movement and external stability. Effective core performance requires coordination of these muscles to maintain posture, balance and functional movement. Methodology: This true experimental, comparative study employed random sampling via the lottery method, involving 30 male athletes aged 17-24. Conducted over four weeks at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, the study utilized the McGill Torso Muscular Endurance Test Battery (trunk flexor, lateral flexors (right and left), and extensor endurance tests) to measure core muscle endurance. Tools used included a Swiss ball, mat, high couch, board or step, stopwatch, and rope. Participants were divided into three groups: Group A (Floor Exercise), Group B (Swiss Ball Exercise), and Group C (Control Group). Procedure: Pre-assessments were conducted using the McGill Torso Endurance Test Battery. Over four weeks, Group A performed floor exercises, Group B performed Swiss ball exercises, and Group C received no specific exercise intervention. Post-assessments followed, comparing pre- and post-test results to determine the effectiveness of each exercise regimen on core muscle endurance. Discussion and Results: All groups showed significant improvement (p < 0.05) in core muscle endurance. Inter-group analysis revealed that Group B (Swiss Ball Exercise) had more significant improvements in all measures (flexor, extensor, right and left lateral flexion) compared to Group A (Floor Exercise) and Group C (Control Group). The unstable surface of the Swiss ball increased muscle recruitment and spinal stabilization, providing a dynamic training environment that enhanced core muscle performance. Conclusion: Intra-group analysis indicated that all three groups improved core muscle endurance. However, inter-group analysis demonstrated that Swiss Ball exercises were more effective than floor exercises and no intervention in enhancing core muscle endurance. KEYWODS: Core Muscle Endurance, Swiss Ball Exercises, Floor Exercises, Athletes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)Same topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207