Suit the Node Pair to the Case: A Multi-Scale Node Pair Grouping Strategy for Graph-MLP Distillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph Neural Network (GNN) is powerful in solving various graph-related tasks, while its message passing mechanism may lead to latency during inference time. Multi-Layer-Perceptron (MLP) can achieve fast inference speed but with limited performance. One solution to fill this gap is through Knowledge Distillation. However, current distillation methods follow a ''node-to-node'' paradigm, while considering the complex relationships between different node pairs, direct distillation fails to capture these multiple-granularity features in GNN. Furthermore, current methods which focuses on the alignment of logits in the final layer ignores further learning within layers inside student MLP. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce a multi-scale knowledge distillation method (MSN-GDM) aiming to capture multiple knowledge from GNN to MLP. We firstly propose a multi-scale node-pair grouping strategy to assign node pairs to different-scale groups according to node pair similarity metrics. The similarity metrics consider both node features and topological structures of the given node pair. Then based on the preprocessed node-set groups, we design a multi-scale distillation method that can capture comprehensive knowledge in the corresponding node-set groups. The hierarchical weighted sum of each layer is applied as the final output. Extensive experiments on eight real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".