MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401023953 · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/211

Outstanding Orthodontist: No More Artifactual Teeth in Talking Face

2024· article· en· W4401023953 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUniversity of WaterlooDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodMonte Carlo tree searchComputer scienceTree (set theory)AlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audio-driven talking face synthesis (TFS) enables the creation of realistic speaking videos by combining a single facial image with a speech audio clip. Unlike other facial features that naturally deform during speech, teeth represent unique rigid structures whose shape and size should remain constant throughout the video sequence. However, current methods often produce temporal inconsistencies and artifacts in the teeth region, resulting in a less realistic appearance of the generated videos. To address this, we propose OrthoNet, a plug-and-play framework designed to eliminate unrealistic teeth effects in audio-driven TFS. Our method introduces a Detail-oriented Teeth Aligner module, designed to preserve teeth details and adapt to their shape. It works with a Memory-guided Teeth Stabilizer that integrates a long-term memory bank for global teeth structure and a short-term memory module for local temporal dynamics. Through this framework, OrthoNet acts like an orthodontist for existing Audio2Video methods, ensuring that teeth maintain natural rigidity and temporal consistency even under varying degrees of teeth occlusion. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method makes the teeth in generated videos appear more natural during speech, significantly enhancing the temporal consistency and structural stability of audio-driven video generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207