Outstanding Orthodontist: No More Artifactual Teeth in Talking Face
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Audio-driven talking face synthesis (TFS) enables the creation of realistic speaking videos by combining a single facial image with a speech audio clip. Unlike other facial features that naturally deform during speech, teeth represent unique rigid structures whose shape and size should remain constant throughout the video sequence. However, current methods often produce temporal inconsistencies and artifacts in the teeth region, resulting in a less realistic appearance of the generated videos. To address this, we propose OrthoNet, a plug-and-play framework designed to eliminate unrealistic teeth effects in audio-driven TFS. Our method introduces a Detail-oriented Teeth Aligner module, designed to preserve teeth details and adapt to their shape. It works with a Memory-guided Teeth Stabilizer that integrates a long-term memory bank for global teeth structure and a short-term memory module for local temporal dynamics. Through this framework, OrthoNet acts like an orthodontist for existing Audio2Video methods, ensuring that teeth maintain natural rigidity and temporal consistency even under varying degrees of teeth occlusion. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method makes the teeth in generated videos appear more natural during speech, significantly enhancing the temporal consistency and structural stability of audio-driven video generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".