MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401036218 · doi:10.1177/10731911241259560

Evaluating the factor structure and measurement invariance of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across multiple countries, languages, and gender identities

2024· article· en· W4401036218 on OpenAlexaff
Loïs Fournier, Beáta Bőthe, Zsolt Demetrovics, Mónika Koós, Shane W. Kraus, Léna Nagy, Marc N. Potenza, Rafael Ballester‐Arnal, Dominik Batthyány, Sophie Bergeron, Peer Briken, Julius Burkauskas, Georgina Cárdenas‐López, Joana Carvalho, Jesús Castro‐Calvo, Lijun Chen, Giacomo Ciocca, Ornella Corazza, Rita I. Csákó, David P. Fernandez, Hironobu Fujiwara, Elaine F. Fernandez, Johannes Fuß, Roman Gabrhelík, Ateret Gewirtz‐Meydan, Biljana Gjoneska, Mateusz Gola, Joshua B. Grubbs, Hashim Talib Hashim, Md. Saiful Islam, Mustafa Ismail, Martha C. Jiménez‐Martínez, Tanja Jurin, Ondrej Kalina, Verena Klein, András Költő, Sang‐Kyu Lee, Karol Lewczuk, Chung‐Ying Lin, Christine Löchner, Silvia López‐Alvarado, Kateřina Lukavská, Percy Mayta‐Tristán, D.J. Miller, Oľga Orosová, Gábor Orosz, Fernando P. Ponce, Gonzalo R. Quintana, Gabriel C. Quintero Garzola, Jano Ramos‐Diaz, Kévin Rigaud, Ann Rousseau, Marco de Tubino Scanavino, Marion K. Schulmeyer, Pratap Sharan, Mami Shibata, Sheikh Shoib, Vera Sigre‐Leirós, Luke Sniewski, Ognen Spasovski, Vesta Steiblienė, Dan J. Stein, Julian Strizek, Meng‐Che Tsai, Berk C. Ünsal, Marie‐Pier Vaillancourt‐Morel, Marie Claire Van Hout, Joël Billieux

Bibliographic record

VenueAssessment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresLawson Health Research InstituteWestern UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandUniverzita Karlova v PrazeNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Cheng Kung UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungSungkyunkwan UniversityNational Research FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceSmoking Research FoundationNational Social Science Fund of ChinaAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPsychologyMeasurement invarianceScale (ratio)Social psychologyConfirmatory factor analysisDevelopmental psychologyStructural equation modelingStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Model and the various psychometric instruments developed and validated based on this model are well established in clinical and research settings. However, evidence regarding the psychometric validity, reliability, and equivalence across multiple countries of residence, languages, or gender identities, including gender-diverse individuals, is lacking to date. Using data from the International Sex Survey ( N = 82,243), confirmatory factor analyses and measurement invariance analyses were performed on the preestablished five-factor structure of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale to examine whether (a) psychometric validity and reliability and (b) psychometric equivalence hold across 34 country-of-residence-related, 22 language-related, and three gender-identity-related groups. The results of the present study extend the latter psychometric instrument’s well-established relevance to 26 countries, 13 languages, and three gender identities. Most notably, psychometric validity and reliability were evidenced across nine novel translations included in the present study (i.e., Croatian, English, German, Hebrew, Korean, Macedonian, Polish, Portuguese—Portugal, and Spanish—Latin American) and psychometric equivalence was evidenced across all three gender identities included in the present study (i.e., women, men, and gender-diverse individuals).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssessmentSame topicImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFrench-language works237,207