MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401041364

Postpartum Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Dual Center Experience.

2024· article· en· W4401041364 on OpenAlexaff
Ridwan B Ibrahim, Lily Olayinka, Anil K. Chokkalla, Sridevi Devaraj

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational diabetesMedicineObstetricsPregnancyDiabetes mellitusCenter (category theory)GestationGynecologyEndocrinologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known to be a predisposing factor in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in affected mothers and their offspring. Current guidelines recommend a two-hour postpartum glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in patients with a history of GDM. However, compliance rates for ordering and completion has been reported as suboptimal. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impact on healthcare systems, requiring the adaptation of novel strategies to manage patients. So far, there is a paucity of data on how this impacts compliance rates for the oral glucose tolerance test. We aimed to compare the compliance rate and impact of the pandemic on OGTT ordering and completion between a women's hospital and a community health center. METHODS: A dual center retrospective cohort study was carried out to compare the compliance for ordering and completion of the two-hour postpartum OGTT in women diagnosed with GDM between a women's hospital and community health center two years pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). RESULTS: 2569 pregnancies were included during these time periods. Prior to the pandemic, the test ordering compliance at the women hospital was 30.2% vs 79.3% for the community health center. During the pandemic, the test ordering compliance at the women's hospital dropped to 24.8%, while it remained steady at the community center (80.8%). Correspondingly, there was a drop in test completion compliance rate at both centers during the pandemic when compared to rate before the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of GDM increased during the pandemic, which may be attributed to factors like sedentary lifestyles, and restructuring of care models, among others. There was increased test ordering and test completion compliance at the community health center compared to the women's hospital, which can be attributed to routine follow-ups and other factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→