Un pouvoir en réseau. Le patriciat académique de Genève et Bâle (1890–1957)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse au cas peu étudié des savants-patriciens à Bâle et Genève. Dans la première moitié du 20e siècle, les pratiques d’héritage, de transmission de fonctions académiques entre générations, mais aussi les alliances entre familles, vont de pair avec l’occupation de fonctions de pouvoir académique et des exigences de formation, notamment à l’étranger. Dans une première partie, l’article présente les grandes évolutions de la composition de l’élite académique de 1890 à 1957 selon trois indicateurs : la proportion des postes professoraux occupés par des descendants de familles patriciennes, le lieu du doctorat et l’occupation de fonctions de recteur des Universités. Dans une seconde partie, il montre la dimension collective du pouvoir des savants-patriciens au travers de l’étude de certaines dynasties professorales et des liens familiaux qui lient les sphères académique, économique et politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".