Analysis of CenKR essentiality in <i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i> and its activity at a target gene promoter <i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The two-component regulatory system CenK-CenR has recently emerged as a regulator of cell envelope and cell division processes in the alpha-proteobacteria. In Sinorhizobium meliloti, CenK-CenR regulates the expression of SrlA, a thioredoxin-domain protein of unknown function. Deletion of srlA causes sensitivity to salt and oxidizing agents on solid growth medium. In this work, we report that the response regulator CenR, but not the histidine kinase CenK, is essential for cell viability in S. meliloti. We also demonstrate that phosphorylation of the target residue D55 is not required for viability, suggesting that the unphosphorylated transcription factor sufficiently regulates expression of one or more essential genes in the genome. Using transcription assays and phenotype testing we examine CenK-CenR-dependent activation of the srlA promoter and demonstrate its absolute dependence on phosphoryl-CenR for activity and that the CenR substitution D55E acts as a phosphomimetic that partially restores activity at the srlA promoter in the absence of phosphorylation by CenK. Finally, we report a mutational analysis of the CenR binding site in the srlA promoter required for transcriptional activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".