Kajian Tanaman Pekarangan di Pulau Kangean, Sumenep, Madura, Jawa Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pekarangan keluarga masyarakat Pulau Kangean mempunyai hubungan yang erat dengan penghuni rumah dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan pekaran dapat menjadikan pekarangan sebagai lumbung hidup, warung hidup, dan apotek hidup sertsa menjadi lahan konservasi kekayaan plasma nutfah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menginventarisasi spesies, menganalisis spesies tanaman pekarangan berdasarkan kegunaannya dan menganalisis bagian tanaman yang digunakan dengan cara mendeskripsikan bagiam dan kegunaan bagian tersebut secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksplorasi dengan bertempat di Kecamatan Arjasa dan wawancara terhadap masyarakat dengan snowball sampling. Berdasarkan familinya, tanaman yang paling banyak ditemui berasal dari famili Anacardiaceae dan Zingiberaceae. Anggota Anacardiaceae dikonsumsi bagian buah sedangkan anggota Zingiberaceae digunakan untuk bumbu masak dan rempah obat atau tanaman toga. Spesies yang ditemukan sebanyak 37 jenis. Kegunaannya antara lain sebagai sumber pangan, tanaman hias, peneduh jalan, tanaman obat dan rempah. Bagian tumbuhan yang digunakan meliputi daun, batang, buah, buah, dan biji atau dengan kata lain seluruh bagian tanaman dapat digunakan oleh masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".