Transition from the neonatal unit to home: Parents' educational needs to promote their psychological well-being and sleep quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parents may experience altered psychological well-being and sleep following the discharge of their preterm infant. They also perceive a lack of information from healthcare professionals. This study aims to describe the educational needs of parents regarding their psychological well-being and their sleep quality following their infant's discharge from the neonatal unit. DESIGN AND METHODS: This descriptive quantitative study uses an online survey to assess parental information needs. Multiple parents (n = 87) completed the survey. Descriptive statistics were conducted to report the results of the survey. RESULTS: According to parents, the most helpful information given by health professionals to reduce the stress felt during this period concerned the follow-up of the infant after hospitalization and access to a health professional in case of questions (n = 12; 31.6%). Few parents (n = 17; 19.5%) reported seeing a health professional about their sleep in the past six months. According to 54.8% of parents, none of the information received by health professionals when preparing for their infant's transition home helped improve their sleep quality. CONCLUSION: After discharge, parents have several information needs that may impact their psychological well-being and the quality of their sleep. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare professionals must address these informational needs before and after discharge from the neonatal unit to enhance the experience of parents during the transition of their preterm infant in the family environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".