MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401070793 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3435514

Device-to-Device Communications With Selection-Based Cooperative RIS

2024· article· en· W4401070793 on OpenAlexafffund
Anirban Bhowal, Sonia Aı̈ssa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work amalgamates spatial modulation (SM) with ambient backscattering (ABSc) to address the spectral and energy efficiency demands of the power constrained device-to-device (D2D) communications in the Internet-of-things. Though incorporating reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) in the communication process can help in extending the coverage of such power constrained devices, rich scattering in the operation environment, or broken links between the nodes involved in the end-to-end communication, can adversely affect the system performance. To cope up with this challenge, a selection-based cooperative RIS protocol is proposed, and the performance of the D2D communication system, founded on SM and ABSc at the transmitter and cooperative RISs, is evaluated in terms of the bit error rate, outage probability, and energy efficiency. A link budget analysis is conducted to comprehend the effects of the RIS sizes in countering the path loss effects, and the imperfection of the channel estimation and timing synchronization of multiple RISs are also analyzed. The results reveal that the proposed communication model with cooperative RISs can overcome the path loss effects and enhance the received power levels, thereby outperforming the baseline system where a single RIS intervenes in the end-to-end communication, with a signal-to-noise ratio gain of around 10 dB for the bit error rate, outage probability, and energy efficiency. Considering different prominent SM techniques for the system operation and comparing the performance in different set-ups, it is shown that the system implementing generalized SM performs the best.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207