MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FETR: A Weakly Self-Supervised Approach for Fetal Ultrasound Anatomical Detection

2024· article· en· W4401072775 on OpenAlexaff
Ufaq Khan, Umair Nawaz, Mustaqeem Khan, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik, Wail Gueaieb

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUltrasoundArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)RadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weakly supervised object detection (WSOD) is a cutting-edge research field within computer vision that aims to detect objects in images with minimal or incomplete annotations. In this regard, we propose a novel WSOD architecture optimized for fetal ultrasound imaging. The model is designed to leverage the inherent capabilities of the convolutional neural network and the transformers to localize and classify fetal anatomical structures within ultrasound images without requiring extensive annotated datasets. Employing a class-agnostic Fetal Transformer (FETR) for generating high-quality object proposals, our approach integrates a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) framework to enhance detection sensitivity. We conduct thorough experiments on the FPUS23 dataset, incorporating strategic data augmentation techniques to ensure model robustness while maintaining the diagnostic integrity of the images. The efficacy of our method is demonstrated through extensive evaluations, where it achieves superior performance against state-of-the-art models, not only on the FPUS23 dataset but also on the Fetal Plane DB dataset, showcasing its adaptability to various imaging conditions. The results from our ablation studies further validate the significance of each architectural component, with qualitative results emphasizing the model's precision and reliability. Our work sets the stage for advanced prenatal diagnostics, promising to elevate the standards of fetal health monitoring and care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207